![]() ![]() For example, I had to manage the newly received materials on the problem of substance misuse. Being a supervisor I came through all the stages and found it extremely useful to reflect upon my actions. ![]() My own experience allows me to confirm the classification stated above. Here an examination of knowledge, feelings, and emotions takes place it is aimed at developing a new perspective on the situation that occurs in the final stage. The second stage is a critical analysis of the situation. The first stage comes with the realization that the knowledge applied in this or that situation was not sufficient to explain what was happening. 124), I can single out three key stages in the reflective process. This type of reflection is more frequent than the first one, because, as a rule, the person does not have time or opportunity to reflect immediately. Thus he or she gains insights for improved practice in the future. It occurs after the event when the person can review, describe, analyze and evaluate the situation. The second type of reflection is reflection-on-action. In that situation, I played the role of the supervisor and had to do my best to demonstrate my competence. I tried to catch the moments when the audience was extremely attentive and followed every word of mine my task was to fix my gestures, voice, intonation, everything that helped me to establish quick rapport with my patients and influence their assumption of the problem. Informing people about the consequences of substance misuse I tried to analyze the effectiveness of my performance to improve it. I used to resort to this type of reflection at the beginning of my practice in the substance misuse center. Reflection-in-action occurs simultaneously as the event happens, the person reflects on one’s conduct with the purpose to optimize the actions that follow. Reflective practice implies the professional’s ability to see the perspectives of his or her practice, understand and appreciate them for the benefit of career prospects.Īccording to Schon, (1987, p.123) there are two types of reflection: reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action. ![]() Types of reflectionĪs in the course of everyday practice professionals face numerous situations which cannot be solved by mere technical rational approaches, reflective practice becomes the necessary ‘tool’ that saves the professional’s competence. The practitioner may require guidance to overcome resistance or to be empowered to act on understanding” (2004, p. Through the conflict of contradiction, the commitment to realize one’s vision, and understanding why things are as they are, the practitioner can gain new insights into self and be empowered to respond more congruently in future situations within a reflexive spiral towards developing practical wisdom and realizing one’s vision as a lived reality. “…being mindful of self, either within or after the experience, as if a window through which the practitioner can view and focus self within the context of a particular experience, to confront, understand and move toward resolving the contradiction between one’s vision and their actual practice. In his work Becoming a Reflective Practitioner Johns states that reflection is: ![]() For example, Dewey defines reflection as thinking about thinking (1933, p.144), whereas Schon (1983, p.134) introduces the wider concept of reflective practice, which, he claims, means an important strategy that helps professionals become aware of their implicit knowledge base and benefit from their experience. However, the very notions of reflection and reflective practice are rather debatable ones. No one would deny the fact that reflection plays an important role in one’s practice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |